The attempted “color revolution” continues to rage in ever changing forms and tactics against Donald Trump and his administration, and will not abate as long as Trump is still in the White House. Trump is seen as a threat to both globalists and cultural communists, who for all intents and purposes have the same agenda – total control over humanity through endless dumbing down of the masses combined with ceaseless, mostly artificial racial and “gender” conflicts designed to result in mindless, deracinated, obedient consumers. There are also mundane reasons, such as the “deep state” protecting its turf, but at its root it’s a top-down “revolution” not much different from the larger, ongoing one that has had its way in Amerika for the past half-century. Whether the Trump administration can, or has any interest in, fighting back tooth and claw and defeating the globalist-communist onslaught remains to be seen. . . . . . . . . . . . Certainly the “mainstream” media hasn’t backed off, attacking Trump on a daily basis with propaganda and fake news. A New York Times editorial in mid-February exhibited a rare bit of honesty by proclaiming, “Where could the demonizing and dehumanizing of the foreign born lead but to a Whiter America?” As the website Chateau Heartiste remarked, “And the truth comes out; what is feared most by the left, and propagated against most vituperatively and diligently by (((the left))) is a Whiter America. A demographic return to the days (not long ago, mind you) when America was 90% White and still in good health is a crucifix to the autonomic anti-White leftoid golem. This is why the left fights so hard against border control and immigrant discrimination. They are nothing and their twisted utopia is dust if the White majority isn’t reduced to a manageable number. As a White man, I sense that war has been declared on me and my kind.” . . . . . . . . . . . . Another New York Times pundit, Nicholas Kristof, recently wrote, “”We’re just a month into the Trump presidency, and already so many are wondering: How can we end it?” The website Sky Bet is taking wagers on whether Trump will be out of office by July. In the last week of February there were over 1,000 references to “Watergate” by the corporate media, almost all of it based on the color revolutionaries still grasping onto the ridiculous “Trump is Russia’s agent” charges. Tis curious indeed that according to these same witch hunters, “McCarthyism” was supposedly a lesson learned about falsely charging people with connections to the communist USSR, but now that Russia is anti-communist, even talking to a Russian diplomat is being equated with treason. Those that predicted decades ago that the U.S. would end up becoming much like the USSR have been proven right. . . . . . . . . . As liberals have indeed become openly totalitarian, it is interesting to remember some of the things they used to claim to stand for but no longer do. As listed by the perceptive Andy Nowicki (“Top Ten Things American Liberals Used to Say, But Don’t Say Anymore”), some of them are: “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” “I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be wary of Russia … but I’m MUCH more frightened by what our OWN government is capable of doing.” “If you don’t like a book, or a movie, or a website, or a speech don’t try to get it banned, and don’t harass the people who created or authored this material you find offensive… just read or watch something else! We do have a little thing called the First Amendment, ya know!” “The CIA is a monstrous organization… do you know some of the things that they have a history of doing? I would never take their word for anything, or trust them in any way… they’re criminals.” And, “We should teach our young people to be open-minded, and to respectfully consider points of view which may differ from their own.” . . . . . . . . . . . Many of the leftist loons are mockingly referred to by nationalists as “snowflakes,” and Ryan Andrews delves into their mindset: “Everyone by now is familiar with the idea that we are all ‘special little snowflakes.’ As far as schoolmarm platitudes go, this seems harmless enough, but the expression is symptomatic of a mindset that emphasizes the individual’s fragility and at the same time strokes his ego. I’m not really thinking of the participation trophy culture here per se, but more of the idea that ‘only you can be you, and you are the most perfect you.’ On the Left, this attitude is accentuated by the fact that the bottom-half of that coalition is made up of minority grievance groups. Among the many grievances these groups have is their belief that society does not understand (and appreciate) them, that their ‘story ain’t been told.’ This all adds up to a personality that is neither equipped nor inclined to tolerate dissent. If only it stopped there, but ‘Progressivism’ does not stop. No, instead we can see the beginnings of something even more brute than Ortega’s mass man; we are moving towards an Orwellian-Orteganism in which the liberal foundation of equality and individual rights is degenerating into a belief that the individual has the right to define how he is perceived by the rest of society. . . The petulant SJW thinks it is his moral right to forcibly suppress the speech of ‘Nazis,’ but in some real sense, he simply desires to force the world to conform to his feelings. This is a dominant factor not just in his motivation to suppress his political opponents, but in the formation of his ideology itself. It is with this next step that the Ortegan merges with the Orwellian. So how do I mean that it contributes to the very formation of his ideology? Well, in part, he has made himself into his ideology (and I mean it when I call it an ideology, because, to him, this is a moral belief). His ideology is that you should see him as the way he wants you to see him. Obviously, it is nothing new for the individual to attempt to project a certain image to the wider world. What is new is: (1.) it is your moral duty to conform your perception to his self-image; and (2.) he needs no reason other than his own feelings. This privilege is not available to every personal orientation, and the thought-process behind it is riddled with contradictions, but none of that is unusual. What is unusual, and amazing really, is that the doctrine exists at all. Consider the logic behind the claim that Caitlin Jenner is a woman. How is he a woman? Because he says so. That is the new standard. If a man claims himself to be a woman, either because he really wants to be one or because he genuinely believes himself to be one — in other words, because in some way, he feels like a woman, polite society is supposed play along. Because it is so natural to feel very strong emotions of both pity and revulsion for people like Caitlin Jenner, the conservative response has largely centered on these emotions, but lost in that response is that this is laying the foundations for a radical new civil right: and again, that is the right to determine how others see you because you feel that is how they should see you. Transgenderism is the extreme end of things, sure, but does anyone think this is where it ends? The now common notion that you (generally a cisgendered white man) cannot ‘question the validity of my [not a cisgendered white man] experience’ is only a degree or so removed from the farce of transgenderism. So what if the data contradicts blacks’ narrative that they are persecuted by law enforcement? That data denies the validity of their experience, therefore it is just another of the White man’s tools of oppression. Back in the days of Ortega’s ‘hyperdemocracy’ they used to say that perception is reality. The mass man of today goes even further; he says “my perception is your reality.”. . . . . . . . . . . . .
This is just a small portion of this issue’s Intelligence Report. Read the rest of it and all Nationalist Times articles by subscribing to America’s best political newspaper: http://americanfreedomunion.com/subscribe/
Or subscribe by snail mail for the ridiculously low price of just $19! That’s less than one-third the regular subscription rate! Or subscribe for two years for just $37. Send your subscription (check, money order or cash) to: The Nationalist Times, P.O. Box 281, Wildwood, PA 15091.
This great offer is for new subscribers only; it is not a renewal rate for current subscribers